« 2013年6月27日 | トップページ | 2013年6月29日 »

2013年6月28日

2013年6月28日 (金)

岩田華怜さんへのファンレター 20130627

AKB48 チームA 岩田華怜さま

こんにちわ。おーにっちゃんです。

あー,まさか韓国の在ハンブルク領事館がNGで返してくるとはなあ。
まあ,あの調子ならば,領事館の外交官が恐らく単独で検討したとは思うんやけど,ワカラン。
ベルリンの大使館に直接言うてみるしかない。

それと平行して,日本の団体にもアレコレ相談してみななあ。

けど,日本の団体というのがやっかいで,税金の控除とかでどうしても政府寄りの人間が入ってきとるんちゃうかと思うねん。

べつに大西弘子に頼るつもりはないけど,あいつなにしてくるかワカランしなあ。
まあ,実家に800万円借金があるから,その借金があるヤツらに養ってもらうのもおかしい,てか逆にワタシが借金肩代わりさせられる可能性も高いしなあ。

いっちゃんええのは,東京のどこかに野宿でもして,支援者を募るねん。
そのへんに出向いて支援者を募り,時間を見て乞食でもするかなあ。

立っとるだけやとアカン,やっぱワタシが,日立製作所から受けた苦痛をずっと言葉で説明していく,それで"おーにっちゃん"で検索してブログを読んで,って言うたら,真実がいっぱい書いてあるし,そのうち支援者はついてくるやろ。

そうすると,宿泊はこの辺かなあ。

山谷 (東京都)
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%B1%B1%E8%B0%B7_(%E6%9D%B1%E4%BA%AC%E9%83%BD)

けどココで,暴力団による暗殺事件も起きとるらしいなあ。

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%B1%B1%E8%B0%B7%E2%94%80%E3%82%84%E3%82%89%E3%82%8C%E3%81%9F%E3%82%89%E3%82%84%E3%82%8A%E3%81%8B%E3%81%88%E3%81%9B

いくら暴力団使うなと言っても,日立製作所はまあ100%どっかの暴力団と手を組んどると思うし,日本政府だってどっかの暴力団と一緒やろ。
困るよなあ。

けど,ワタシを殺したくない人間もおるはずやねん。

言うてもワタシも,誰もやらん貴重な体験を次々とやってきとるんやから,しかもその間にいっぱいブログとか2chに書いとるから,なんでもネタが出てくるのも分かっとる。
だからやっぱ,とりあえず出版社回りはやってみるべきやろなあ。

いくら日立製作所や日本政府のコトやから出版社も書かんとはいえ,なかにはそれで大儲けを考える会社も出てくると思うねん。
出版して真実をあらわにしたら,日立製作所や日本政府のほうがおかしいコトやっとるって一目瞭然やからなあ。

とはいえ,なんべんも言うように,誰かは認めてくれる,と思ったって,認めてもらえるストーリーを自分で描けな難しいわな。

いまさらやけど,なんべんも言うけど,最初から韓国に行って,韓国のマスコミに対してニュースにするように働きかけとったら良かったよなあ。
または,アメリカでもいい。アメリカやったら英語やし,ドイツ以上に現地のヒトと交流できた。
ドイツでは現地のヒトを味方につけるというのがどうしてもできんかったのも痛かった。

けど,そんなんもやってみなワカランよなあ。

あとはカネやなあ。もう何回もおんなじコト言うてまうけど。
カネをなんとかいっぱい用意して,自分の意見を聞いて主張してくれるヒトを雇ったらよかったよなあ。
カネ持ってなくても,それぞれ職業についとるヒトはちゃんとしたコトを言うてくれると思うとったけど,そういうワケでもない。

日本で弁護士を雇って,告訴状を書かんでもええから,ちゃんとワタシの案件を理解して,ワタシの案件を援護射撃してもらうようにカネ掴ませとったら良かったなあ。
いやそんなカネはなかったんやけどよ。

ドイツに来てから,マスコミが騒いでソコでカネが入るとかも思うとったしなあ。

まあけど,見通しが甘いままで出てきたのも必ずしも悪くないんやけどな。
見通しが甘いから行動できんというのは,一般人全員そうやけど,見通しが甘いんちゃうかという不安なんか適当なトコでバッサリとやってもて,出たトコ勝負する,そして走りながら方向修正して考える,それくらいの胆力があってはじめて大成功できると思う。

そりゃ,秋元康だっていっぱい失敗してきたんやから。

まあ,いまなんかでも7時台の1時間に179アクセスあったみたいやし,ワタシのコトを観察しとるのが明らかにおるねん。
9割がアンチでも1割はワタシのコトをちゃんとしたこと書いとると思うやろ。

雑誌の編集者とか大勢見とると思うけどなあ。
アクセスの5割くらいが東京なんやで。
いくら東京に一極集中しとるったってそれはおかしいやんなあ。

たとえば
-------
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%A6%96%E9%83%BD%E5%9C%8F_(%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC)

東京都市圏では定義にもよるが約3,400 - 3,700万人
東京都区部の人口は895万人(2012年12月現在)

東京都では

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%9D%B1%E4%BA%AC%E9%83%BD

総人口 13,269,061人(推計人口、2013年5月1日)
-------

って書いてあって,ココログの"東京"は東京都のはずやから,人口の1/10がアクセスの半分くらいやねん。

やっぱ東京には出版とかマスコミとか多いから,そういう関係のヒトらの閲覧が多いんやと思うなあ。
尤も日立製作所も,本社は東京にあったりするから,ワタシを監視しとるヤツらもおるんやろけど。

まあ,あんまアタマが纏まらんからもう寝るわ。

ほなね。

2013/6/27 Viölにて おーにっちゃん

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R_q9pk70_Y6C8wKicH49KxuJ74vrhmOUYeFtyptXEPU/edit?usp=sharing

대한민국에 망명을 희망합니다. 7 / 1 (월)에 보관되어 강제 송환 될 예정이다. 시간이 없습니다.

대한민국 베를린 대사관 귀중

나는 "大西秀宜"라고합니다. 일본인입니다.

나는 일본에 있으며, 히타치 제작소에 근무하고있었습니다 만, 작년 1 / 27에 개인 정보 보호법 위반 받았습니다.
그것을 변호사에 호소했는데, 변호사는 훌륭한 범죄라고했지만 검찰에 호소해도 검찰은 접수주지 않기 때문에와 고소장의 기재를 거절했습니다.

따라서 나는 고소하는 수단이 아니라 공익 통보하는 수단에서, 히타치 제작소와 경제 산업성에 호소했지만 모두 이유를 말하지 않고 거부했습니다.
나는 언론에 호소했지만 아무데도 기사에하지 않았습니다.

어쩔 수 없기 때문에 인터넷에 그 취지를 쓰고 있으면, 비방으로 지난해 6 / 22 히타치 제작소에서 징계 해고되었습니다.
이 때문에 다음날에 독일에 와서 망명 신청을하고있었습니다.

그러나 그 신청도 "분명히 이유없이"며 기각되었습니다.

그런데 내가 신청시 제출 한 많은 자료가 모두 분실되고 그 것을 지적해도, 독일 정부는 아무런 대처 해주지 않습니다.
독일 정부가 일본 정부의 일 이니까라고 제대로 조사하지 않은 것은 분명하다.

따라서 올해 6 / 11 대한민국 함부르크 영사관에​​ 망명 신청을했지만, 오늘 6 / 27에 기각되었습니다.
한국에 와서 "refugee"이면 받아들일지도 모르지만, "exile"이면 받아 들여지지 않는다고 들었습니다.

하지만 지금 일본 정부가 실시하고있는 것은 분명 법률 위반 은폐이며 문제입니다.
아무래도 나의 망명 신청 거부 내용은 한국 영사관 직원 씨가 결정됐다고 생각 합니다만,이 내용을 대사관 대사로 알고 주시면, 반드시 문제이며, 망명을 인정받을 수있는 것이 아닐까 생각합니다.
따라서 메일했습니다.

대한민국은 일본 정부가 잘못된 행위가 종종 있다는 것을 이해해 주실 수 있다고 생각합니다.
따라서 나의 망명 신청 것도 반드시있을 수없는 이야기는 아니라고 생각하실 것입니다.

나는 7 / 1 (월)에 보관되어, 7 / 2 (화) 함부르크를 떠나 7 / 3 (수) 도쿄에 송환 될 예정입니다. 시간이 없습니다.

그쪽에 가서 설명 싶습니다. 그대로 망명 신청하여 대한민국에 보호 주셨으면합니다.

【최신판】 히타치 제작소에 의한 개인 정보 보호법 위반 사건에 대한 설명
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2013/06/post-c7a9.html

→이 범죄의 개요 설명입니다.

망명 신청 거부 독일어 자료
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2013/06/post-1e2d.html

→ 망명 신청 거부 독일어 자료입니다. 이에 대한 나의 의견 및 자료를 바탕으로 검토되지 않은 것을 다음에 기재 지적하고 있습니다.

My Claim to South Korea
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2013/06/my-claim-to-sou.html

Question to BAMF 01-07
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2013/06/question-to-bam.html

또한이 문서에 대해 독일 정부는 일절 보려고도하지 않았습니다.

기타이 사건에 대한 사실과 그것을 바탕으로 한 나의 생각을 다음에 기재되어 있습니다.

오 -에 정액 짱의 블로그 : 히타치 개인 정보 보호법 위반
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/cat53787351/index.html

일본에 있으면 이러한 범죄가 은폐되는 것이 가장 무서운 것이라고 생각합니다.
돌아 가면 일본의 폭력단 등에 말살되는 두려움도 있습니다.

어쨌든, 내 사건을 보도까지 가지고 가지 않으면 무서워서 귀국은 할 수 없습니다.

제발, 망명 신청을 접수 주셔서 저를 보호 해 주시도록 부탁 드리겠습니다.

大西秀宜

또한이 글은 Google 번역기
http://translate.google.co.jp/

에 의해 자동 번역되었습니다.
일본어에서 한국어로 번역 한 것을 다시 한번 일본어로 번역 해보고, 대략 의미가 다니고 있기 때문에, 내가 전하고 싶은 내용을 이해할 수 있다고 생각합니다.

----

大韓民国への亡命を希望します。7/1(月)に収容され強制送還の予定です。時間がありません。

大韓民国ベルリン大使館御中

私は,"大西秀宜"と申します。日本人です。

私は日本におり,日立製作所に勤めていましたが,昨年1/27に個人情報保護法違反を受けました。
それを弁護士に訴えたところ,弁護士は立派な犯罪と言いましたが,検察に訴えても検察は受理してくれないからと,告訴状の記載を拒まれました。

このため,私は告訴という手段ではなく公益通報という手段にて,日立製作所や経済産業省に訴えましたが,どちらも,理由を言わずに却下しました。
私はマスコミにも訴えましたが,どこも記事にしませんでした。

仕方がないのでインターネットにその旨を書いていましたら,誹謗中傷として,昨年6/22に日立製作所から懲戒解雇されました。
このため翌日にドイツへ来て,亡命申請をしていました。

しかしその申請も"明らかに理由なし"として却下されました。

ところが,私が申請時に提出したたくさんの資料が全て紛失されており,そのことを指摘しても,ドイツ政府はなんら対処してくれません。
ドイツ政府が,日本政府のことだからと言ってしっかり調査しなかったのは明らかです。

このため,今年の6/11に,大韓民国ハンブルク領事館に亡命申請をしましたが,本日6/27に却下されました。
韓国に来て"refugee"であれば受け入れるかもしれないが,"exile"であれば受け入れられない,と伺いました。

しかし,いま日本政府が行っているのは明らかに法律違反の隠蔽であり,問題です。
どうも私の亡命申請却下については,韓国領事館の職員さんが判断されたと思うのですが,この内容を大使館の大使に知っていただければ,きっと問題であり,亡命を認めていただけるのではないかと思います。
このためメールしました。

大韓民国は,日本政府が間違った行為を行うことがたびたびあることを理解していただけていると思います。
このため,私の亡命申請もあながちありえない話ではないと思っていただけると思います。

私は,7/1(月)に収容され,7/2(火)にハンブルクを発ち,7/3(水)に東京に送還される予定です。時間がありません。

そちらに行って説明したいと思います。そのまま亡命申請して大韓民国に保護していただきたいと思います。

【最新版】日立製作所による個人情報保護法違反事件についてのご説明
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2013/06/post-c7a9.html

→ この犯罪の概要説明です。

亡命申請却下のドイツ語資料
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2013/06/post-1e2d.html

→ 亡命申請却下のドイツ語資料です。これに対する私の意見,および,資料を元に検討されてないことを,以下に記載し指摘しています。

My Claim to South Korea
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2013/06/my-claim-to-sou.html

Question to BAMF 01-07
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2013/06/question-to-bam.html

なお,この資料に関してドイツ政府は一切見ようとさえしませんでした。

その他,本事件に関する事実およびそれを元にした私の考えを以下に記載しています。

おーにっちゃんのブログ : 日立製作所個人情報保護法違反
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/cat53787351/index.html

日本にいれば,このような犯罪が隠蔽されることが,最も怖いことであると思っています。
帰ったら,日本の暴力団などに抹殺される恐怖もあります。

とにかく,私の事件を報道にまで持って行かねば,怖くて帰国はできません。

なにとぞ,亡命申請を受理いただき,私を保護いただきますよう,お願いいたします。

大西秀宜

なお,この文章はGoogle翻訳
http://translate.google.co.jp/

により自動翻訳しました。
日本語から韓国語に訳したものを,改めて日本語に訳してみて,おおよそ意味が通っていますので,私が伝えたい内容を理解していただけると思います。

Question to BAMF 01-07

Question to BAMF 01.

Documents submitted during the meeting of 16/7/2012 as evidence have been lost, except for passport, airline tickets, business cards. In addition, additional letters I sent later have also been lost. For example, such as those complained of a tyranny of the Deutsche police in the letter.
BAMF might think they shall not trivial, but when Onishi becomes deported to Japan temporarily, may be lack of evidence suing without that article. I presented  them because I thought they were the most important evidences.
In addition, it may seem I should have made a copy, but because there was the meeting immediately after exile in Deutschland, I did not know how to take a copy in Deutschland.
I asked by letter and e-mail to send copy to Bundesamt, but did not have heard from him since.

Now I have no evidence of a letter, but I have a mail to demand a copy.
I wrote in that e-mail, "I had requested to Bundesamt and local officer many times to send me copies of my documents, but nothing had done."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: hidenobu onishi

Date: 2013/4/19
Subject: BAMF did nothing to me, which is against the AsylVfG law.
To: "ivs-anfragen@bamf.bund.de"

, gfrbe@unhcr.org, jpntopi@unhcr.org
Cc: central@iso.org, info@karelvanwolferen.com, info@wolferen.jp



Dear Deutsche Bundesamt and UNHCR Berlin & Japan office,
Cc: Prof.Wolferen, ISO central office



I am Hidenobu Onishi, the first refugee of Deutschland from Japan.
My ID number of Deutschland is 5556608-442.



I had requested to Bundesamt and local officer many times to send me copies of my documents, but nothing had done.

Let me show you;

http://www.iuscomp.org/gla/statutes/AsylVfG.htm

Section 21 Retention and transfer of documents
(4) Copies of the documents taken into custody shall be provided to the foreigner on request.



Deutsche Bundesamt has to send me copies on my request, as written.
Please do so.

I will read the law and indicate what Deutsche Bundesamt has to do, on next week.



I can also read the Japanese version of AsylVfG and explanation of that from the file below.

http://www.ndl.go.jp/jp/data/publication/legis/216/21602.pdf



Hidenobu Onishi
kotochan0725@gmail.com

http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I ask for the return of these materials.

Question to BAMF 02.

You might think my evidences you lost were insignificant, but they were most important materials for the asylum application. So I think it is a big problem without reviewing the asylum application.
The fact that the letter has not been carefully studied, is apparent, because I had reported in a letter that report to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry is rejected in September

The evidence is:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4/9/2012 P57
1. Yesterday, I called to Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry to hear my whistleblowing sent 19/4/2012. The person said research finished one month before and nothing against the law.
I told why, I want to discuss why nothing against the law, but he said he can say nothing and if I have a question I have to go to the court.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

and, the report does not reflect the fact, I had rejected.

Also, the request to send a copy of the evidence materials, meeting requirements of such additional, are not accepted wholly.
Of course, documents submitted to the meeting held at 16/7/2012 had lost, and it is not been studied at all. That is also apparent.
From the fact that not only from my memory, but also the fact I explained about the Personal Information Protection Act violation in detail in the meeting, you can imagine easily I had handed to Bundesamt not only passport, airline tickets, business cards, but also many evidence documents.
The materials Bundesamt seems to have lost, I come up now, are as follows.

﹞ Whistleblower writing to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (In it, attached criminal mail documents IT Strategy Headquarters created, which violates Personal Information Protection Act)
﹞ Complaint to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office, and the reason document for the rejection about that (reason for the rejection is the lack of configuration requirements, in that document it was described that I should talk with a lawyer, etc., so I don't think that is not the reason for claims Onishi made is not a crime).
﹞ Mail a total of 100 hip, sent to 11 people director of Hitachi, Ltd.(and 4IDs, total 15IDs), to sue the personal information protection law violations. (Why Onishi sent so much? You may think, but I explained the reason in 16/7/2012 meeting.)
﹞ Information manual from the industrial physician Minoru Arai, and the response from Daisuke Mori. I think doctors should consider only treatment of the disease, and had an order to make suspension from "a light manic state", is believed to be ultra vires.
(I think if I were a severe manic state, it'll be allowed. But there is a fact, another doctor Takuro Endo said I had nothing bad.)

Also, since there are some missing pages, and nested pages, the possibility that investigators have lost article is inferred easily.

Let I tell:

P63 is, despite being described as "1/6", there is only one page. Investigators had lost five.
P64, P65 was described in 29/11, from the fact that there is a statement that "November 29th" in the fourth row of the P64. However, the P66, there is a receiving push of "28.Nov.2012". The order is reversed.
The P66, it is with "I send a letter 3 days before", and is also on the P68 "I used Japan Airlines (JAL) and, my customer information leaked. 3days before I told one, but, occurs another." And further, since the term "26/11/2012" in the signature line of P69, there should be a letter written in "23/11/2012". And you can imagine, the mail contents written in 23/11/2012 is a disclosure of personal information about JAL.
Materials P122-123, P124-125 are a pair, but P126 is only one. One page had been lost.

Other problems are, I was beaten by Bundesamt calling the police 12/07/2012(say later), and, I called once to Neumunster in October around, to make a counseling. And I had heard the phone number twice, and in addition, I repeated to say, but that was a FAX number. I called there twice.
Neumunster person cheated me.

The following request in letters sent to Bundesamt has not been fulfilled at all.

--------------------------------------------
4/9/2012 P62
I want to tell many peoples the truth of Japan.

After November 29th (correct date not written) P64-65
And now, I a sincerely hope, I want a interview by a person.
Since I am a refugee of politics, I want to tell my problems all over the world.
I already sent so many massages to Bundesamt,
(Abbreviation)
I convince, if I meet a person such as a UNHCR, an expert of world peace, an university professor, they can think it's a big problem and they may introduce me to some correct person, such as mass-communication.
Please think about these matters.

26/11/2012 P69
Anyway, Japanese Government and Japanese companies leaks so many privacy informations of me. That is accurately persecution.
Please take account of these facts.

22.12.2012 P76
Please investigate about this.
If I have to, I will go anywhere and I will tell about my opinions.
If you say, I will correct my doings.

11/1/2013 P80-81
In these mails, Chisa Yamamoto did hacking with account of Naoya Muraoka.(* P84)
She may also hacked Manabu Takahashi.
This is exactly a crime.
Muraoka says, he will tell Japanese police about this. I want to tell this to Deutsche police. Please investigate about this.
Chisa Yamamoto demands me commit a suicide two times. (* P83”自ら命を絶つという選択肢もあるかと思います。 I think you have a choice to commit a cuicide”, P88”日本に早く帰るか,自ら命を絶ってください。 You shall go back to Japan soon, or shall commit a suicide.”) This is apparently illegal in Deutsche, I think.
These are strictly persecution by Japanese people. Please investigate.

8/1/2013 P96-97
They told me so many lies and they tried me insult and threat.
(Abbreviation)
And, for Chisa Yamamoto's case, She is my home country's person.
I am refugee. I have got serious crime from my home country, Japan.
She has no right to insult and threat me.
That is persecution from Japan.

2/4/2013 P120-121
I wrote many opinions below site for almost 10 months, and Hitachi's person, I convince, attacked me so much.
http://awabi.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/company/1363341628/l50
(Abbreviation)
I have caught so many attacks every day.
Many people say me, Commit a suicide!
I want your reply as soon as possible.
--------------------------------------------

Question to BAMF 03.

Hitachi has continued to attack against Onishi thereafter.
I think those attacks are against the Personal Information Protection Act, Privacy Mark, and those base, OECD privacy principles.
However, even if I appealed to Bundesamt, Peter Martensen, and Zink Ailne, they ignored or did nothing because it was a matter of Japan.

If Hitachi, in an organized manner is violating the Personal Information Protection Act, Privacy Mark, and those base, OECD privacy principles now and attacks me on the Internet, I think Privacy Mark buro and Bundesamt can never say the answer "no problem concerning about the privacy mark and personal information protection law" by Hitachi is correct.
It is not possible to state definitively without having to study to have doubts about the story of Hitachi, because it is lack of thinking the case of Hitachi violates those Acts and cheats you.

Hitachi, Ltd. had wrote the reason for the disciplinary dismissal of me as "slander on the Internet". And I had seen Hitachi person read the writing to 2ch (Internet site) in the meeting at the time. Therefore it is clear that Hitachi organisation is monitoring 2ch.
However, Onishi has been under attack from the man looked like Hitachi's employee who write my personal information at Hitachi, again and again.
You may say that is a problem of Japan, but I want to confirm you that it is not in accordance with the OECD privacy principles that Japan also comply.

----------------------------------
OECD Privacy Principles
http://oecdprivacy.org/

1. Collection Limitation Principle
There should be limits to the collection of personal data and any such data should be obtained by lawful and fair means and, where appropriate, with the knowledge or consent of the data subject.

2. Data Quality Principle
Personal data should be relevant to the purposes for which they are to be used, and, to the extent necessary for those purposes, should be accurate, complete and kept up-to-date.

3. Purpose Specification Principle
The purposes for which personal data are collected should be specified not later than at the time of data collection and the subsequent use limited to the fulfilment of those purposes or such others as are not incompatible with those purposes and as are specified on each occasion of change of purpose.

4. Use Limitation Principle
Personal data should not be disclosed, made available or otherwise used for purposes other than those specified in accordance with Paragraph 9 except:

a) with the consent of the data subject; or

b) by the authority of law.

5. Security Safeguards Principle
Personal data should be protected by reasonable security safeguards against such risks as loss or unauthorised access, destruction, use, modification or disclosure of data.

6. Openness Principle
There should be a general policy of openness about developments, practices and policies with respect to personal data. Means should be readily available of establishing the existence and nature of personal data, and the main purposes of their use, as well as the identity and usual residence of the data controller.

7. Individual Participation Principle
An individual should have the right:

a) to obtain from a data controller, or otherwise, confirmation of whether or not the data controller has data relating to him;

b) to have communicated to him, data relating to him

i) within a reasonable time;
ii) at a charge, if any, that is not excessive;
iii) in a reasonable manner; and
iv) in a form that is readily intelligible to him;

c) to be given reasons if a request made under subparagraphs (a) and (b) is denied, and to be able to challenge such denial; and

d) to challenge data relating to him and, if the challenge is successful to have the data erased, rectified, completed or amended.

8. Accountability Principle
A data controller should be accountable for complying with measures which give effect to the principles stated above.
----------------------------------

The main thing of violation is the following. (I take some.)

﹞ A detailed medical history, medication history information of Onishi only be known by Hitachi industrial physician Minoru Arai and the attending physician Daisuke Mori, who is also hired by other division of Hitachi as a industrial physician

【onishi】日立製作所の裏事情70.7【ビザ期限切れ】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1348658012/

958 :M[]投稿日:2012/10/07(日) 14:53:26.01 ID:XKmVrW9e0[1/1回(PC)]
>>952
大西さんについて補足しておきます。
彼は休職中の2011年7月から少なくとも2012年2月まで
リタリンを服用していました。
そのため9月の復職後は副作用による様々な
悪影響があり、社内SNSへのAKBに関する投稿を
他人の迷惑も顧みずに行い、やがて歌詞を転載する
という行動に出て現在に至ります。

Note about Onishi.
He was taking Ritalin until February 2012 at least from July 2011.
There is a variety of negative impact, after returning to work in September, so he did posts about AKB to the corporate SNS without regard to the nuisance of others, and then did the behavior to reprint the lyrics and it now leads out.



Why the person can write about my medical history in detail?
I must say this is by Minoru Arai or Daisuke Mori.
This is also an abuse of confidentiality as a doctor.
Defamation of Onishi, too.



【懲戒】日立製作所元社員大西の事情70.12【解雇】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1353478945/

632 :A[]投稿日:2012/11/25(日) 23:46:33.34 ID:NeoaUjpC0[1/1回(PC)]
大西さんは休職中の昨年7月から復帰後の今年2月まではリタリンの
(Abbreviation)
復帰時点で彼が服用していた薬は
ソラナックス、デパケン、アタラックス、リーマス、レンドルミン、
ベンザリン、デパス・・思いつくままに挙げると・・
誰が見ても異常な薬漬けの状況でした。

Drugs he was taking at the return point,
Let I show as it occurs to me...
Solanax, Depakene, Atarax, Limas, Lendormin, Benzalin, Depas...
It was a situation of abnormal drugged, as anyone can see.



Why the person can write about my medicine history in detail?
I must say this is by Minoru Arai.
This is also an abuse of confidentiality as a doctor.
Defamation of Onishi, too.



【老婆】元日立製作所の大西の事情70.14【襲う】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1355552582/

657 :A[]投稿日:2012/12/21(金) 22:56:50.70 ID:3ARlTmDk0[1/1回(PC)]

あなたは昨日嘘をつきましたね。
リタリンについては大西さんには全く効用がなく副作用の影響とみられる
異常な行動が散見されたので、リタリンの処方を止めてもらいました。

You told a lie yesterday.
I saw some abnormal behaviors seemed to be caused as side effects, and there are no effect at all for Onishi for Ritalin. I had to stop the prescription of Ritalin.



Why the person can write about my medical history in detail?
I must say this is by Minoru Arai.
This is also an abuse of confidentiality as a doctor.
Defamation of Onishi, too.

﹞ A detailed worker's information of Onishi only be known by Hitachi person

【onishi】日立製作所の裏事情70.7【ビザ期限切れ】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1348658012/

34 :O[]投稿日:2012/09/27(木) 01:01:23.15 ID:FP0MbQ0A0[1/3回(PC)]

大西君はさあ相手に確認せずに決めつけるよね?
休職についても2ヶ月前の診断結果を頑なに主張してたけど、
荒井さんの診断を受けた後で確認してなかったよね?何事においても根拠が弱いよね?

Onishi declares not to confirm the other.
Onishi had claimed results of the diagnosis about the leave of absence made two months ago stubbornly, but you didn't confirm after a diagnosis of Arai's? You are weak in basis, everything ?



Why the person can write "you didn't confirm after a diagnosis of Arai's"?
I must say this maybe Ofuji, but anyway he says person's name "Arai", so he is a worker of Hitachi.
This is also a defamation of Onishi.



【新チームA】日立製作所の裏事情70.9【伊達娘命】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1350564419/

142 :K[]投稿日:2012/10/20(土) 09:07:55.01 ID:+VsAdvbJ0[1/1回(PC)]
こもれびへの書き込みも9月頃からはじまって
内容が同じような投稿ばかりで皆さん辟易してましたよ。
大西君は相手の事を考えられるようにならないと。

Write to "Komorebi" also began around September, and those posts were just similar, so everyone had been fed up with.
Onishi has to be thinking about the other party.

Why the person can write about "Komorebi"'s writing?
I can't say who is this, but anyway he can say "Komorebi" doing of me, so he is a worker of Hitachi.
This is also a defamation of Onishi.



472 :O[]投稿日:2012/10/23(火) 08:12:39.15 ID:Nkq4UlkI0[2/2回(PC)]
大西君さあ、大西君ができないというのはカンパニーにおいて公然の事実じゃなかったっけ?
大みかから異動したのは出世じゃないというのはいいよね?

Now you Onishi, the fact Onishi could do nothing at work was well known to the public company?
The change from Omika works was not a promotion, you understand?

Why the person can say my change "from Omika works was not a promotion"?
Omika works is a Hitachi's real works.
I must say this maybe Ofuji, but anyway he knows inside affairs of Hitachi well.
This is also a defamation of Onishi.

【ドイツ】元日立製作所の大西の事情70.13【永住】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1354208277/

799 :N[]投稿日:2012/12/13(木) 04:41:28.38 ID:ynDrarbF0[3/3回(PC)]
最後にもうひとつ
お前は人のことを情報を抱え込んで保身しているとかなんとか
言ってるけどさ、
自分のパソコンにでしか出来ないことがあるのにパスワードの共有もせず、
夜に作業している人間を困らせて電話せざるを得なくする状況って
それじゃないのかい?

One last thing.
You are saying that is self-protection racking the information to a person.
You annoyed a person who was working at night and forced to phone because you did not share the password of your own PC with him.
The situation you said is just that?

I remember, that was happened about 10 years ago. The time my boss was Satoru Nagai, and he ignored me and he gave me no work to me, I convince he had persecuted me, so I got angry, and just once, I didn't tell the password and went home. But he called me and I told my password. Nothing bad.
So I must say this must be Satoru Nagai.
This is also a defamation of Onishi.
And, he has written so many times in internet about the password problem, but I think I did only one time a pinprick, so he couldn't say other problems to me.



【老婆】元日立製作所の大西の事情70.14【襲う】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1355552582/

21 :I[]投稿日:2012/12/15(土) 18:26:00.91 ID:Rv0xMoyt0[1/1回(PC)]
大西って思い込みが強くてやってられないんだよね~
何年か前にSNSで知り合った同僚が彼氏持ちだと
言ってるのにも関わらず妄想していないか倦怠期かのどちらかや!
だって・・・・・
なんか個人の趣味で美術館とか博物館とかに一人でいくのは相方がいない証拠
なんだって。

I feel Onishi is troublesome, because he is strong in belief.
Some years ago, regardless of colleagues who met Onishi at SNS were speaking about she had a boyfriend, Onishi had a delusional mode, and he said she had really not a boyfriend, or either bored with a boyfriend!
A woman going alone to museums or Museum of Art as a hobby of individuals, is the evidence who must not has a boyfriend, he said.
This is about Mizuho Saijo, who is working in Hitachi Ultra LSI company, as I said that anywhere.
You may think that is true or not, but anyway that is my privacy.
And, the SNS is strictly Komorebi. Komorebi is used by Hitachi group company.
It may written by Mizuho Saijo, but I think this is written by Waka Igarashi, who had hate me so much. In Komorebi, she blocked my access.
And even worse, many of my friend had become blocking my access, when they had befriend to Waka Igarashi.
I convince she had done negative campain in Komorebi to me.
Anyway, this is also a defamation of Onishi.

86 :O[]投稿日:2012/12/16(日) 00:12:00.83 ID:NB8SAP0e0[1/2回(PC)]
大西君さあ、大西君がAKBに関しての投稿及びコメントについて、
業務が成立しない頻度だったというのは証明できる事実だよ。
それから面談で大西君自身が成果をあげられていないと認めているよね?
大西君の問題行動って、こもれび運営事務局が上長にメールを出す前から問題視されていたんだよ。

You Onishi, Onishi you made so many posts and comments about AKB, and you could not work. I can prove that as a fact.
Then, Onishi, you admitted you could not have been paying off at the meeting?
Behavior problems about Onishi was, before executive secretariat of Komorebi sent an email to his boss, that was seen as a problem.
Hitachi's people have no rights to write my working attitude.
And, I had a progress report meeting with Yokosuka, who was my boss, once at a time.
Yokosuka said me nothing.
I said I couldn't make an outcome, but the most big reason was Yokosuka gave me a little work since December. Yokosuka removed me from all of projects.
Anyway, this is also a defamation of Onishi.

328 :Y[]投稿日:2012/12/17(月) 22:42:01.97 ID:KCYkg1Rx0[1/1回(PC)]

大西君は4月の時点で精神に異常をきたしており、異常行動を連発し
会社側としても手をこまねいていた状況でした。
従って法に触れるような事についても躊躇なく行うんでしょうね。
4月~懲戒解雇までにおける大西君の問題行動の【一部】を以下に記述します。
これを見て公平な目で審判する裁判官はどうお思いになるのでしょうか?

1.3月25日よりアメリカ旅行に行った際に職場上長に身内の不幸のため
実家に帰ると虚偽の理由で休暇申請を取る。
2.4月8日東京ビッグサイトで行われたAKBの握手会において
AKBメンバーを恫喝して泣かせた上、スタッフに暴言を吐くなどやりたい放題。
物々しい厳戒態勢で握手を行う。
3.4月16日社長及び取締役に100通のメールを送付して問題となる。
4.4月18日異常な行動により産業医が軽そうと診断を受ける。
5.4月19日経済産業省に公益通報書提出
6.4月21日実家にて休職を説得した際に休職不要との診断を受けたのが
2ヶ月前で有効ではない事が判明
7.5月8日懲戒一日の処分(自席のPCからLANケーブルに接続できなくされる)
8.5月23日勤労面談でヤフーファイナンスへの書き込みを本人と認める。
就業時間中に自己判断による休憩で24Fの休憩スペースで書き込み。
就業規則違反だと認める。
9.5月23日経済産業省に公益通報を出す。
10.5月30日出勤停止15日の懲戒処分となる。
11.5月31日懲戒処分を受けたにもかかわらず出社。
12.6月10日懲戒処分中にも関わらず北海道旅行
13.6月21日懲戒明けの面談においても改悛の情は見られず。
14.6月22日懲戒解雇

Onishi had mentally ill at the time of April, and did the string of abnormal behavior, so the company was at a loss what to do with him.
Therefore, I guess he could make things like touching the law without hesitation.
Let me show Onishi's problem behaviors from April to disciplinary dismissal[part].
How judge who has a fair eyes think, when he get to see this?

From the 25th march, when he went to America travel, he said he would go home owing to a bereavement as a false request, and he took a vacation.
(abbreviation)

Truly I said wrong reason to my boss to go to America, but not "bereavement", because I took rights may be one week or so before.
Why could I say bereavement one week before?
And, I went New York Times at the travel. If I said truth things to go to America, my boss may reject, so I said I will go home.
But anyway, my boss Yokosuka gave me no work, anyway he didn't talk to me, if I said something to him. I thought he was ignoring me.
I must say this must be Yasushi Yokosuka, was my final boss in Hitachi.
This is also a defamation of Onishi.
Onishi had mentally ill is so defamation.



These are just a few examples. So many insults to me is written in 2ch, in internet.
And, persons who can know the personal information of Onishi in Hitachi are so limited. so I can imagine some people who is writing them.
I suspect initials of the last name of the writing people, is written in the name field.
For example, as follows.
Y may Yasushi Yokosuka
N may Satoru Nagai
O may Ofuji (I don't know his name)
I may Waka Igarashi
Sk may Seki (I don't know his name)
F may Kazunori Fujiwara
S may Masataka Shiba
K may Toshiya Kurakake

Why they do those things? I don't know. But anyway that is happening.
If you think that is unbelievable, please click those URL and see the writings and translate to your own language.
Never think "Everything Onishi tells unbelievable", and never decide without investigation, as many people include BAMF did.

Claim information about Onishi in Japan Airlines, that only be known by the workers of Japan Airlines,

【懲戒】日立製作所元社員大西の事情70.12【解雇】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1353478945/

221 :名無し[]投稿日:2012/11/23(金) 10:28:28.84 ID:1qllQfb70[1/1回(PC)]
この人、さかもと未明さんを批判してるけど人のこと言えない。
5年以上前の話ですけどこの方の手荷物のパソコン等の収納スペースが
なかったみたいで合図されたらしいんですが気づかずにそのままに
なってしまいました。

これに立腹したのかチーフパーサーにとんでもない剣幕で起こり
担当者が直接お詫びをしなければなりませんでした。

This person has criticized Mimei Sakamoto, but he can not say other person.
It is a story of more than five years ago, there was no storage space, for his bags, personal computer, he seem to have been signaled, but he had remained alone by CA without noticing (CA said "start preparation" and all of them sat their own seats).
He may got very angry, personnel have to apologize directly to him, in the threatening attitude to chief parser.

I remembered, that occurred about 6 or 7 years before using JAL.
I had got angry, because Cabin Attendants are "Safe security guard", for planes may get serious accident.
All of Cabin Attendants forgot to check the cabin and sit, so I thought I couldn't trust my life to those people if there is an accident.
Anyway, why my privacy in JAL's is leaking?
Can't that be said as persecution from Japan?
This is also a defamation of Onishi.

222 :名無し[]投稿日:2012/11/23(金) 15:07:11.07 ID:ZTG/7LJI0[1/2回(PC)]
JALではクレーマーとして名が通ってた。
自分は上客というのを振りかざして特権を要求してた。
対人関係全てにおいてこれなんだと思う。

His name was well known as claimer in JAL.
He had requested the privilege by brandishing a good customer.
I think he does such in all interpersonal relationships.

I said sometimes difficult demand as a good customer, but that was as negotiation, anyway just I tried to. I didn't demand so severe.
I think I was thought truly good customer, Cabin Attendant of All Nippon Airways said to me I was so humble, in a plane a year ago.
Anyway, why my privacy in JAL's is leaking?
This is also a defamation of Onishi.

510 :名無し[]投稿日:2012/11/25(日) 04:07:20.12 ID:UgtRM/FX0[1/1回(PC)]
>優先搭乗したことはあるけど、優先搭乗を強要したことはないぞ?
マニュアル通りの対応してどないする?って言うたことはあるかもやけど、
優先搭乗強要はしたことない。知らん。ホンマに知らん。
いつどこで言った?

忘れたとは言わせない!
あなたが上の方でしつこく出してる水とゆずを間違えたときに
言った。
その場で怒った後、ご丁寧に他の客室乗務員に再度
クレームを上げ、その時にいろいろおっしゃってました。
それともうひとつ言うと、普通の言い方だったら絶対に水と言われてゆずジュースは
出しません。
薬をちらつかせたと言うけど見えたという確信はありますか?
上の方で子供をその場で叱るのが普通と書いておられますが
後から別の人間を捕まえてクレームする必要はありますか?
どうしても我慢できないんだったらコメントカードに書けばいいのでは
ないんですか?

> I had used priority boarding, but I had never been forced a priority boarding.
I might say, you shouldn't treat us in accordance with the manual only.
Say again, I had never forced a priority boarding. Truly I don't remember.
When and where did I say?

You must not say forgot!
When you indicated a mistake, "citron" and "water", you are persistently saying towards the top of this page.
After angry on the spot, you said the claim again to the other cabin crew. At that time you had said in various things.
And I say one more thing, if you pronounced correctly Cabin Attendant must not bring citrus juice, said water.
You said you showed medicine to the Cabin Attendant, but are you certain that looked by her?
Above you write when someone scold children, usually do on the spot, but if so why you had to claim to catch another person later?
If you couldn't endure, do you think you could write in the comment card?

I showed a medicine with looking the Cabin Attendant.
But she mistook "mizu" to "yuzu", so I scolded to her.
And, she seemed to feel no remorse over, so I said to another.
That's all.
Anyway, why my privacy in JAL's is leaking?
This is also a defamation of Onishi.

Question to BAMF 04.

In the 2ch website, there was a post looked like the BKA.
In the report of the Bundesamt, nothing is described about research to 2ch.
BKA wrote themselves? Or human pretending to BKA wrote?
It is not clear to Onishi.

【老婆】元日立製作所の大西の事情70.14【襲う】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1355552582/

451 :Instruktion[]投稿日:2012/12/19(水) 08:00:00.27 ID:UEZF0Jtn0[1/1回(PC)]
BKA 80 168 176 88 177 200 184 104 86 17 228 113 111 236 124 108 52 90 72 133 239 70i 85 181 155 182 228 141 90h 156 8 229 9 223
A0 215 223 68 148 33s 122 240 248 205 74 204 127 74 8 11i 249 B0 192 122 78 60n 102 244 144 226 58 96 56o 6 105 150 115 3
C0 67 1 30u 52 226 188 193 174 135 188 246 106 182 43b 188 231 D0 165 254 135 183 134 134 157 118 177 100 130 165 204 49o 10 110
E0 101 205 83n 56 163 147 188 39 131 227 31 94 193 89e 215 37 F0 103 137 238 205 32 30d 106 238 71i 191 143 88 86 135 41h 86 BKA
Umsichtig handeln

Question to BAMF 05.

To appeal for violations the personal information protection law by Hitachi to Onishi, there was no clear answer from Hitachi, privacy Mark Office, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, etc.
First, Onishi, a Hitachi IT Strategy Headquarters of IT Division, which created the problem mail, is an organization separated with Hitachi Transport System, Inc. (one of In-house Companies of Hitachi) I was belonging to. There is no hierarchical relationship between each Division.
http://www.hitachi.co.jp/about/corporate/organization/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2013/03/15/130401_j.pdfhttp://www.hitachi.co.jp/about/corporate/organization/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2013/03/15/130401_j.pdf
I explained that IT Strategy Headquarters made a material from my personal informations, which was collected from personal mail of "Komorebi", directory from me to "Komorebi" Administration Bureau in IT Strategy Headquarters, without consent of Onishi.
(Contrary to, such as Article 15 (1) Article 16 (1))

個人情報の保護に関する法律
Act on the Protection of Personal Information
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=130 &
Article 15 (1) When handling personal information, a business operator handling personal information shall specify the purpose of utilization of personal information (hereinafter referred to as "Purpose of Utilization") as much as possible.
Article 16 (1) A business operator handling personal information shall not handle personal information about a person, without obtaining the prior consent of the person, beyond the scope necessary for the achievement of the Purpose of Utilization specified pursuant to the provision of the preceding article .

In the material made by "Komorebi" Administration Bureau, twitter writing seemed written by Onishi (The user didn't write the name in twitter account) was used as Onishi's writings.
These are contrary to Article 15 (1) Article 16 (1) as well.

Although Onishi sued to Hitachi compliance division about the case above-mentioned, Hitachi compliance division did wrote on Parrot words of Onishi, and wrote there is no problem.
------
2012年4月25日 コンプライアンス本部
交通システム社 経営企画部 研究開発企画室 大西秀宜様
コンプライアンス通報回答の件
首記の件,貴殿から2012年4月11日付でいただいた通報に関し,下記の通り回答します。

1.通報内容
(1)(I戦)にて個人情報の無断収集および開示が行われている。
(2)上司や総務/勤労/産業医の指示のもと,そう病により休職を指示する診断書を作成されそうになり,危うく休職に追い込まれるところだった。
2.回答
(1)(I戦)が貴殿の上司に対して,貴殿のこもれびの書き込みなどを送付したことを確認しましたが,当該行為に,コンプライアンス上の問題はないことを確認しました。
(2)貴殿と関係者の間で話し合いが行われたことを確認いたしましたが,当該話合いの過程においてコンプライアンス上問題となることは確認されませんでした。
以上
------
------
Compliance Division April 25 2012
Research and Development Planning Department / Corporate Planning Department / Transportation Systems Inc.
Mr. Hidenobu Onishi
Review of compliance report answers
Regard to report that we received in the April 11, 2012 review from you, of the neck mentioned, let's answer as follows.
Chronicle
1. Report content
(1) Disclosure and unauthorized collection of personal information by (IT strategy) has been carried out.
(2) From instructions made by my boss, and general affairs / labor division / industrial physicians, I was likely to be created a medical certificate document which indicates the leave of absence by mania, I was almost forced to leave.
2. Answer
(1) It was confirmed that for the boss of you, (IT strategy) was sent your writings in "Komorebi", and so on, but it was confirmed that, in the act, there is no problem of compliance.
(2) It has come to our attention that the discussion has been made between you and the parties concerned, but in the course of the discussion there was seen no problem of compliance.
Or more
------
Because "the reason" s not listed at all, Onishi asked to Hitachi people, "Why you say there is no problem, please say the reason.", but the relationship of the Hitachi did not answer at all.

To Onishi's appeal, Privacy Mark Office said "There is no problem, because Hitachi says that as labor management information".
Onishi appealed that, "you say leakage of information is legal, but previously that, it is illegal to collect personal information by the unauthorized department, and further, the collection of twitter is also illegal.", but they did not hear me.
---
Time:2012/05/09 14:20:22 (GMT+09:00)
From:プライバシーマーク事務局 消費者相談窓口
To:onicchan@docomo.ne.jp
大西秀宜 様
 (株)日立製作所のSNSサイト運営事務局が、大西様と同事務局とのやり取りの内容等を大西様の上司に連絡したことに関しては、「当該連絡は従業員の社内における行動を所属部署の上司に伝え、職場指導を依頼するための社内連絡であることから、雇用管理の問題である」と(株)日立製作所より報告がありました。
 以上の事業者報告より、当事務局では、「当件は個人情報の漏えいに該当しない」と判断致しましたことをご連絡させて頂きます。
(このメールは発信専用アドレスにより送信しております)
******************
一般財団法人日本情報経済社会推進協会
   プライバシーマーク事務局
     消費者相談窓口
******************
---
---
Time: 2012/05/09 14:20:22 (GMT +09:00)
From: Privacy Mark Office Consumers consultation window

To: onicchan@docomo.ne.jp
Mr. Hidenobu Onishi
Hitachi, Ltd., reported, for the SNS site Management Office of Hitachi, Ltd., contacted the boss of Onishi about the exchange of them, "the contact his or her divisions boss is, since reports the actions of in-house employees and requesting a in-house guidance, that is a matter of employment management."
From above reports, in our office, we tell we have determined that the "this matter does not fall under the disclosure of personal information".
(I have been transmitted This e-mail by the send-only-address)
******************
General information the Japan Association for Promotion of economic and social
Privacy Mark Office
Consumers consultation window
******************
---
Because "Privacy Mark Office" is a third party position, which should direct Hitachi, must answer by an independent survey, instead of trust the answer of Hitachi, Ltd.,
Onishi complained that, but, Privacy Mark Office did not listen at all.
As for the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Onishi claimed over again and again to have the opportunity of detailed description from Onishi, which shall be heard, as guidelines of treating a claim from Whistleblower indicates.
------
国の行政機関の通報処理ガイドライン (外部の労働者からの通報)
http://www.caa.go.jp/seikatsu/koueki/gyosei/files/gaibu.pdf
Report processing guidelines of the Administrative Organs of the country (Reports from workers outside)
http://www.caa.go.jp/seikatsu/koueki/gyosei/files/gaibu.pdf
(2) Implementation of Survey
① Once you have accepted the report, you make the necessary investigation.
② As for the implementation of investigation, it is done, to protect the confidentiality of whistleblowers, while consideration enough to whistleblowers is not specified, without delay, or using any other method that is found to be reasonable and necessary.
③ Concerning about such as ensuring appropriate law enforcement, when under investigation, trade secrets of an interested person, trust, and honor and privacy, should be protected, and, on the progress of the investigation, tell to the informants appropriately times, and, the results should be issued so promptly, and should tell without delay.

(5) Notification of measures to whom report
① When an administrative organ has taken measures, for whistleblowers, should be informed its contents without delay in consideration of privacy, such as ensuring the appropriate law enforcement, trade secrets of an interested person, trust, and honor.
② Each administrative agencies, should set the standard processing period to the end of the process from receipt of notification, or for whistleblowers, should inform without delay a period, that is expected to required.
------
Contrary to, above guideline, My demand was all rejected.
In addition, without having to answer to Onishi, Japanese Government finished the survey in August (four months was passed) in silence as no problem.
Onishi, requested the contents many times, but they don't tell me at all, and only said "If you have any question, go to the lawyer" (I thought it must be "go to the court").
Even though guidelines write "should" instead "shall", so the Government doesn't have to treat whitsleblowing, but once the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry received the whistleblowing, I think it shall not do the behavior that deviates guidelines significantly.
I described a report at that time on Internet (2ch). Let me show.
------------------------------
【onishi】日立製作所の裏事情70.5【隔離病棟】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/company/1346340321/

265 :hidenobu onishi ip-80-226-24-13.vodafone-net.de 忍法帖【Lv=32,xxxPT】(1/5:0) []投稿日:2012/09/03(月) 15:10:23.75 ID:XWqQLpIy0[3/16回(PC)]
(* I write English translation only. Japanese is seen by above site)
New Facts About Personal Information Protection Act violation
As a result of contact, Industrial Machinery Division of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, one time will not lead even wait 3 minutes, placed on hold in the inside of a section.
Because a trick by Industrial Machinery Division was suspected, secondly I had called to Information Economy Division, and from there transferred to Industrial Machinery Division, and the person answered.
It has been answered as follows.
Fact of the Personal Information Protection Act violation by Hitachi was not observed, and the necessary research had been aborted in more than a month ago.
Can not be explained any specific content of the survey.
I requested the number of day and month accepted the Whistleblower manual, and the number of day and month broke off the investigation, but the person said no explanation.
Because Onishi was not saying a need to contact, so didn't make contact to Onishi's home, etc. I answered because this inquiry comes.
Views of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry is as such, we recommend that you consult the lawyer if there are doubts.
I made sure that I will ask not a lawyer, but a way to exile to the BAMF.
------------------------------
Originally, the person who accused should be waiting for an answer, so the answer must be transmitted to him? Is that a work? If no telling, what bureaucrats think is the goal of the work?
Even if it has not been made compulsory by law, the applicant requested and had a contact many times, so can bureaucrats say under no obligation to tell?
Guidelines for Whistleblower is one in which the Japanese government is to proactively protect, to enlightenment in each local government. I heard this from a person in a Consumer Agency, which is a regulatory agency of the Whistleblower Protection Act.
If Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, a Japanese government is not protected in the case of a complaint of Onishi, and defending in the case of appeal, and if other Whistleblowers are done as written in the guidelines, then in accordance with the principle of equality, why the case of Onishi is not protected, I think should be an explanation of the reason at least.

6. In this way, Onishi, is keenly aware that people usually say "because Hitachi said,". People and organizations don't think by themselves, they ought to swallow the claim of large organizations. I am also acutely aware that  large organizations often hide criminal things get together.
Onishi strongly say, that it is necessary to think "what is real thing with reference to evidence, rather than who and what organisation is saying".
But, no one and no organisation can say the reason referenced to the evidence, so about the exile of Onishi, no one thought as reference to the evidence.
Onishi had became refugee because of those thinking ways of Japanese people, but at present even in the asylum, from prejudiced impression of the BAMF has, Onishi is subject to persecution from the BAMF.
Even, BAMF is bullying me. That is strictly an abuse of Onishi's human rights.
Suppose, if any one organization that explains the reason, I was to be explained with reference to the evidence, there was no need to exile Onishi, for I could talk to the organisaiton.

From the report by BAMF, it has written that there is no reason at all of complaints by Onishi. However, when Onishi was in Japan, not all were necessarily rejected the declaration of me. One Doctor, and two lawyers, admitted some part of the story by me.

One doctor was Takuro Endo.
http://www.sleepmedicine-tokyo.com/doctor/

Endo, who is Alienist told me, Onishi is not the disease, nothing is bad.
Further, why Onishi receive the misdiagnosis was, he pointed point out the problems of the health care system of Japan.
And, the law relating to industrial physician system was also a problem, he said.
But he could not assist Onishi legally.

Two lawyers told me, both of them said Onishi's case is really a problem.

1 person was Hiroyuki Adachi.
http://www.bengo4.com/search/130699/

When Onishi first met, he told me projects of Onishi will be a major event that comes to broadcast by evening news of NHK.
However, even if I called so many times and reminded him, he did no act at all to me then, I decided not ask to him.

Second person was an Shinichi Shima.
http://www.surugadai.ac.jp/gakubu_in/houka/curriculum/staff/professor/s_shima.html

When he first met to Onishi, he also said that is a crime.
However, Onishi insisted that this a criminal case, not a civil action, I want to create a good complaint to prosecutors office in Tokyo, but he reminds persistently as a civil action, because he said prosecutors don't receive.
Onishi felt, this matter become pointless to be in civil cases, despite this case is apparently a criminal case.
Onishi decided not to ask for this lawyer.

In this way, I want you to understand that for the review of Onishi, not all said no problem at all.
Rather, please consider the fact that, experts with each field talked to me much and said "this is a problem", but large organizations had neither talk chance nor gave no reports with some reason.

Onishi contacted other lawyers, but it was rejected without look, the reason was: "criminal cases become not much money."
Mr.Shima, too, argued strongly to the civil action rather than a criminal case. I think in fact Shima wanted a lot of money.
So, Onishi, was not able to find a lawyer before I caught disciplinary dismissal from Hitachi, willing to write a complaint of criminal cases.

Question to BAMF 06.

And, recently, some comments are written in internet which indicates Deutschland's Government and Japanese Government talk much, without hearing my saying.

---------- 転送メッセージ ----------
From: hidenobu onishi
日付: 2013年4月13日 16:29
件名: Threat to me came, in which written, "Deutsche Government will refuse Onishi's application in June".
To: gfrbe@unhcr.org, "ivs-anfragen@bamf.bund.de"

Dear Bundesamt and UNHCR Berlin office,

I am Hidenobu Onishi, the first refugee of Deutschland from Japan.
My number is 5556608-442.

Today, I got a commnent below:

---

http://anago.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/tubo/1355273129/560

(* now the url is hidenobu onishi 忍法帖【Lv=40,xxxPT】
http://www.logsoku.com/r/tubo/1355273129/560)

560 :dinq:2013/04/13(土) 06:51:47.61 ID:rbzh6nRs0
先週、デュッセルドルフとハンブルクに出張した。
ハンブルクの取引先と会食をした時に、大西なる人物を知っているかと尋ねられた。

日本では有名人だと本人は主張しているそうだが、ぜんぜん知らなかったので、帰国後に検索してここを知った。
2チャンネルの一部では名を知られているようだが、それは「有名人」とは言わないので、ちょっと?な人物と印象を持った。
投稿を飛ばし読みしてみたが、ほとんど意味不明な主張の繰り返しで、彼の不合理な行動と置かれた状況を理解しかねた。

取引先相手が話していたことを紹介するが、とてもそのまま書ける内容では無かったので、婉曲な表現にしている。

大西氏はハンブルグの在留邦人にはよく知られた名前で要注意人物であり、ハンブルク北方120km程度の村に住居を与えら監視されている。
彼は、亡命申請を出したが、調査の結果それは事実に基づかない虚偽の申請と判断され、直ぐには申請却下の結論を出さないで、
そのペナルティとして事実上の軟禁状態にされている。しかし、6月になれば正式却下の結論を伝えるようだ。

在留邦人の人々は大西氏の行為に対して大変に怒っていて、厳しい表現で説明をしてくれた。
大西氏の経歴、年齢から考えたらとても不合理な行動をしている。その原因は、彼の誤った戦略・戦術によるものだが、
失敗の原因全てを他人の責任に転嫁するという特異な思考により、ますます孤独化して行くだろう。
私は、正直、このような人物とは関わりたくないので、この投稿が最初で最後にしておく。

---

In which written:

Onishi is well-known on the blacklist among Japanese people in Hamburg, and he is supervised now, given a house in a village 120km north from Hamburg.
He applied for asylum, but the Bundesamt investigated and that was considered as false, because that was not based the facts.
Bundesamt decided not to display the conclusion soon, and as a penalty to his false application, he is kept in his own custody now.
Bundesamt is planning to tell Onishi to reject in June.





I think that is not based on the fact.
But that is only my analogy.
Deutsche Bundesamt person might leak information of the fact to Japanese person, and the person might tell me.
The probability, that Bundesamt person does wrong is not zero, so you nor me can't declare.

If that is true, that is a problem not only of Japanese Government, but also of Deutsche one.
So Deutsche Bundesamt and UNHCR have to investigate about that.

I am very uneasy now, so Deutsche Bundesamt and UNHCR have to explain me even if that is not the fact.
I think that is Deutsche Bundesamt's role.

I want a investigation in good faith.



Hidenobu Onishi
kotochan0725@gmail.com

http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/

----------------------------------------------
http://anago.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/tubo/1368755317/

(* now the url is 日立製作所を公益通報→懲戒解雇された大西秀宜スレ
http://www.logsoku.com/r/tubo/1368755317/)

364 :工作員:2013/05/23(木) 22:04:09.30 ID:yYJUba1A0
>>342
> 不当解雇を訴えるのは労働基準監督署とかやけど,労働基準監督署は既に
> 日立製作所が手を回しとったから,意味ないと思ったからスルーしたの。

ドイツへの亡命申請も意味ないよ。
既に外務省と日立がドイツ政府に手を回してるから。
日立には外交官出身のゴマソール取締役がついているから、それくらいのことは朝飯前。
----------------------------------------------

In that, one wrote;

Becoming a political refugee (that is me) to Deutschland is meaningless.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan and Hitachi company already lobbied to Deutsche Government.
In Hitachi company, Sir Stephen Gomersall works as a director, who is ex-diplomat of the United Kingdom.
Hitachi makes nothing of it.



Stephen Gomersall
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Gomersall
http://www.hitachiforum.eu/cvs/StephenGomersall.htm



If it is true, does Deutsche Government hide my problem?

Please investigate if it is true or not.



Best regards,
Hidenobu Onishi
kotochan0725@gmail.com
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/

Question to BAMF 07.

I want to say if you don't think there are no difficulty, hear the person's saying.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: hidenobu onishi

Date: 2013/4/23
Subject: Who have responsibility?
To: asia@rsf.org, europe@rsf.org, kontakt@reporter-ohne-grenzen.de, "ivs-anfragen@bamf.bund.de"

, gfrbe@unhcr.org, central@iso.org, jpntopi@unhcr.org, info@wolferen.jp, info@karelvanwolferen.com



Dear Reporters without borders, Deutsche Bundesamt and UNHCR Berlin & Japan office,  Prof.Wolferen, ISO central office

I have got the mail below yesterday via facebook:

---
Reporter Ohne Grenzen e.V.
Dear Hidenobu Onishi,
Thank you for your message. Unfortunately we are not able to help you regarding your matter. This is because Reporters without Borders is an international human rights organization supporting journalists in need and fighting for press freedom. However, our staff members don’t pursue investigative journalism themselves.
We document on violations of freedom of expression and information all over the world and we also alarm the public if there are any media representatives in danger. Our global network for fast communication and intervention is possible through the support of more than 150 correspondents worldwide as well as our sections in many countries for example the US, Austria, Tunisia, Libya and Spain.
We thank you for your understanding and still wish you success with your cause!
Best wishes
**** ****
---



I want to say strongly, who have responsibility?

This is not only a problem of journalism themselves.

I brought a whistleblowing to Japanese Government.
But they did nothing, because they didn't want to solve the problem which would punish Hitachi, which company has cozy relationship to Japanese Government.

I brought a whistleblowing to Japanese journalism.
But Japanese journalism didn't accept that, because they didn't want to broadcast the problem, because they had cozy relationship to Japanese Government. For example, "kisha clubs(*)".

I made a refugee application to Deutsche Bundesamt.
Deutsche Bundesamt is holding my problem for 10 months, I don't know why they take so long time.
And I have sent many mails to Deutsche Bundesamt, mentioning about Deutsche's law, in which written, they have to send me a copy of my evidences when I say I want a copy. But they did nothing.

I have sent so many mails to UNHCR, but they did nothing.

I have sent so many mails to Deutsche journalism, but they did nothing, because they said "that isn't our problem".



Then, who can solve that?
Do I only have to wait without a time period?



But, I want you to think, if my saying is true, who can decide that?

I strongly state, you have to remember the poem;

-----
Als die Nazis die Kommunisten holten,
habe ich geschwiegen;
ich war ja kein Kommunist.

Als sie die Sozialdemokraten einsperrten,
habe ich geschwiegen;
ich war ja kein Sozialdemokrat.

Als sie die Gewerkschafter holten,
habe ich nicht protestiert;
ich war ja kein Gewerkschafter.

//////////////////////////////////
Als sie die Juden holten,
habe ich geschwiegen;
ich war ja kein Jude.
//////////////////////////////////

Als sie mich holten,
gab es keinen mehr, der protestieren konnte.
-----

If you say I have to solve the problem myself, can you introduce a journalist who is interested in Japan?
That is what you can.
You should not be a bystander.

Anyway, please answer me.



(*) Reporters Without Borders wrote reports below;
---
http://fr.rsf.org/IMG/pdf/classement_2013_gb-bd.pdf
Japan resorts to press restrictions
Japan, demoted from 22nd to 53rd place, recorded the biggest drop of any Asian country.
The reason was the ban imposed by the authorities on independent coverage of any topic related directly or indirectly to the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Several freelance journalists who complained that public debate was being stifled were subjected to censorship, police intimidation and judicial harassment.
The continued existence of the discriminatory system of “kisha clubs”, exclusive press clubs which restrict access to information to their own members, is a key element that could prevent the country from moving up the index significantly in the near future.
---



Hidenobu Onishi
kotochan0725@gmail.com
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/

My Claim to South Korea

I am Hidenobu Onishi, a first refugee from Japan.

I came Deutscheland in 23/6/2012, and now living in Viol.

Op de Geest 45
25884 Viol
0151-2558-8795
kotochan0725@gmail.com

I become refugee because I had met a serious crime in my company, Hitachi.
My privacy was illegally issued by Hitachi IT stragegy devision, in 27/1/2012, and using the information, finally I was told to long days rest because of mania by company's industrial doctor.
But I had gone to another doctor, and why does he say such a thing? I said, and the doctor said I had nothing ill, Hitachi took a trick.
And I whistleblowed that, but Hitachi and Japanese government did nothing, hid that.
I told this to many newspapers in Japan, but they did nothing, I think because of cozy relationship.
Then I was at a loss, so I wrote about the real fact in internet many times, and I was disciplinary discharged in 22/6 because of writing such things.
(Please read in detail Question to BAMF 05)

I came Deutschland, and went some newspapers, but they had no interest because they say that is Japan's problem.
No one did say "that is the problem of me".

And, since last October, seemed Hitachi person write so many Onishi's privacy like such:
a. A detailed medical history, medication history information of Onishi only be known by Hitachi industrial physician Minoru Arai and the attending physician Daisuke Mori, who is also hired by other division of Hitachi as a industrial physician
b. A detailed worker's information of Onishi only be known by Hitachi person
c. Claim information about Onishi in Japan Airlines, that only be known by the workers of Japan Airlines
which mustn't be leaked by big companies like Hitachi, also illegal in Japan's law.
If Japanese Government and Hitachi was right, they didn't write those things.
(Please read in detail Question to BAMF 03)

And, recently, some comments are written in internet which indicates Deutschland's Government and Japanese Government talk much, without hearing my saying.
One wrote, Onishi had to wait so long (a year) as a penalty.
If that is true, that is against Deutschland's law.
(Please read in detail Question to BAMF 06)

Deutsche Government finally decided me as "reject with apparently no reason", but Deutsche Government lost some documents intentionally.
I feel that because yesterday (10/6) I met a lawyer and told my evidence were almost lost, that is strictry a problem, but he said he can't tell why.
I thought the lawyer and the Government were negotiated.
(Please read in detail Question to BAMF 01, 02)

I want to say if you don't think there are no difficulty, but someone has, that must be fully investigated as told.
(Please read in detail Question to BAMF 07)

And some people are writing many insults to me in the site below.

日立を公益通報→懲戒解雇された大西秀宜スレ2
http://anago.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/tubo/1369823536/l50

(* now changed to new page 日立を公益通報→懲戒解雇された大西秀宜スレ3 http://anago.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/tubo/1371656006/l50)

大西秀宜 is my name.
Many says, I will be arrested when I go back to Japan.
I am so afraid that.

Organisation or mass communication tell the truth of me.
I hope South Korea do.

11/6/2013 Hidenobu Onishi

個人情報保護法は社内にも適用されます

いまだにこのようなことを言っているヤツがいる。

-----
日本人大西秀宜韓国へ亡命申請中
http://awabi.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/korea/1371555132/l50

297 :マンセー名無しさん:2013/06/28(金) 02:35:03.14 ID:V6ISMZWu
>>283
どの条文?
23条辺りとか?w
上司は第三者じゃないし。
そもそも、大西を特定する情報は個人情報ではあるけど、個人情報保護法の対象はB2Cだろ。
同じ社内での話の場合は、社員情報だろう。
あともうひとつ。
平時ならいざ知らず、お前は規約違反の上、逆切れしてクレームつけたんだよな?
その情報は当然のようにお前の処遇決定者に伝えられなければならない。
そこにお前の許可は要らない。
もうこの辺りは個人情報保護法とは全く別の世界。

あとは凡例。
最近Twitterなどで犯罪自慢、炎上、自慢した者の所属組織(会社や学校)から解雇や退学を言い渡されるケースがあるが、それも大西に言わせれば、不当な個人情報収集であり、重大な個人情報保護法違反なんだよなw
ここら辺まで来ると、お前がそう思うならそうなんだろう、お前の中ではな、のAAを貼りたくなって終了だわw
-----

確かに直属の上司は第三者ではない。
何らかのときに個人情報に接してしまう"うっかりミス"だってあるだろう。
たとえば,上司が私に対して個人的に"こもれび"の書き込みを注意したのであれば,私はなにも文句は言わなかった。

今回の私の指摘は,大西の個人情報収集権限のない"IT戦略本部 こもれび運営事務局"が私の個人情報を収集したのであるから問題と言っているのである。

-----
IT戦略本部 こもれび運営事務局 による違法作成資料の紙資料

経済産業省公益通報書
https://plus.google.com/u/0/103299321834603136878/posts/3kdQSrfuE9L

資料を電子データ化したもの

日立製作所の個人情報保護法違反メール(2012/8/2の内容の再掲)
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2013/05/201282-5bdf.html

日立製作所の個人情報保護法違反メール添付資料
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2013/05/post-9618.html
-----

然るに,インターネット上で記事にしたところも,そこが問題と思ったのか,そこをあえてぼかして,上司が私に直接注意したことにしている。
これでは,私がいくら訴えたところで,誰も信用しないのも仕方がないとも言える。

-----
AKB歌詞書き込みで上司が注意 社内SNSは有用だが、トラブルも
http://www.j-cast.com/2012/06/30137177.html?p=all

日立製作所では、ある男性社員が好きなアイドルグループ「AKB48」をヒントに業務上のアイデアを出したが、曲の歌詞をSNSに書き込んでしまった。それを著作権の問題から上司が注意したところ、勝手に書き込みをのぞき見たとしてトラブルになり、男性社員がこのことをネット上に書き込む事態にまでなってしまった。

日立製作所の社内SNSでAKBトーク→歌詞描いたりするなと上司に怒られる→個人情報保護法違反だと社長に100通メール→業務妨害で懲戒解雇 : 市況かぶ全力2階建
http://b.hatena.ne.jp/entry/kabumatome.doorblog.jp/archives/65687924.html
-----

そして,個人情報保護法の対象がB2Cというのは,経済産業省自身がそう言っているが,じつは条文にはB2Cとはどこにも記載がない。

-----
個人情報の保護に関する法律(平成十五年五月三十日法律第五十七号)
http://law.e-gov.go.jp/htmldata/H15/H15HO057.html
-----

そして,社員の情報も個人情報保護法の対象であるとは,いろんなところに記載してある。

-----
違法な収集に抑止力が働かなかった五つの理由
http://www.nikkeibp.co.jp/sj/2/column/c/19/index1.html

 度を越した違法な社員情報の収集・利用は、日航だけに限った話ではなく、多かれ少なかれ他の会社でも行われているのではないか。そう推測するのには理由がある。次の5点に集約できると思っている。

社員の個人情報も個人情報保護法の対象になるのでしょうか
http://oshiete.goo.ne.jp/qa/4143577.html

社員の情報も個人情報保護法の対象
http://a-j.jp/topics/2005/20050323kojinjouhou-hogohou.html

【2】社員データも個人情報

 ところで、個人情報と言うと、真っ先に顧客の個人情報が浮かぶかもしれません。

 しかし、顧客の個人情報はもとより、社員の個人情報も、この法律の対象に含まれます。すなわち、社員の個人情報も、この法律に則って適切に取り扱わないといけないということです。

 実際問題として、患者の個人情報を持っている医療機関でもない限り、一般の企業では顧客の個人情報より、社員の個人情報のほうが、より重要な情報が多いのではないでしょうか。
-----

また,twitterで犯罪自慢などが問題になるのは,それだけ大勢が個人を特定して騒ぎが起きたためであり,そうなると一企業が故意に個人情報を収集する以前に個人情報が出てしまっているのである。

私の場合は,騒ぎなどはおきておらず,一企業が故意に個人情報を収集した上での取得であるから問題と言っているのである。

さて,私に対して十分に反論できるであろうか?

ハゲテツはどんどんヨウワカランほうに走って行くなあ。

-----
憲法96条を先行改正=慰安婦問題「史実を解明」-維新公約【13参院選】
http://www.jiji.com/jc/c?g=pol_30&k=2013062700872
http://news.mixi.jp/view_news.pl?media_id=4&from=diary&id=2483589

改憲実現のため発議要件を衆参両院の3分の2以上の賛成から過半数に緩和する96条改正を先行実施することを掲げた。橋下徹共同代表(大阪市長)の従軍慰安婦をめぐる発言で批判を浴びたことに関しては、史実の解明に努めると明記した。
-----

憲法は改正を議論すべきと思うので,発議要件が低くなっても問題ないと思います。3分の1以上にしたっていい。片方の院だけだっていい。
そこから議論すればいいのだから。

mixiニュース(時事通信)では慰安婦問題をぼかしてかいてあるけれども,他のソースからはもう少し突っ込んで書いてある。

-----
維新、慰安婦問題の事実解明 参院選公約を発表
http://www.47news.jp/CN/201306/CN2013062701001518.html

橋下徹大阪市長の発言で党勢の失速を招いた従軍慰安婦問題に関しては「歴史的事実を明らかにし、国の名誉を守る」と明記し、事実関係を解明する方針を打ち出した。

憲法改正の発議要件を定めた96条の先行改正、自治体首長と参院議員の兼職規定撤廃などを掲げた。
-----

「歴史的事実を明らかにし、国の名誉を守る」とは,てんでワカランことを言っている。
いまさら歴史的事実を明らかにするもなにも,言い分は出きっているはず。

しかも,事実だったと説明している人に対して,アレコレいちゃもんをつけて事実でなかったとするのはおかしい。
その上で「国の名誉を守る」なんてのは,既に事実を求めるのではなく,日本国側の言い分を押し通す意図を強烈に感じる。

本当に「国の名誉を守る」のであれば,慰安婦の方々が亡くなってしまう前に,日本は謝罪できると思う。

ドイツから7/3に強制送還される予定です。相談に乗っていただきたいと思います。

はじめまして。私は大西秀宜と申します。

私はもともと日立製作所に勤めていました。
昨年1/27に,私が社内のイントラサイトに対する苦情を社長に報告したところ,IT戦略本部は,それまでイントラサイトで私が送付していたメールなどを収集した上で資料化し,私の上司になげつけました。
それを元にして,産業医と面談させられ,休職を判定させられました。

どうして休職なのかさっぱり分からないため,別の精神鑑定医さんにお話をしたところ,どうもそれは会社内部で違法なことをやっているようだ,と言われました。

このため私は個人情報保護法違反としてコンプライアンス通報や公益通報をしたのですが,日立製作所も経済産業省も,その他マスコミ等にも送付したのですが全てダンマリを決め込み,仕方ないのでインターネット上に記載していたところ,それを日立製作所への誹謗中傷として,昨年6/22に懲戒解雇されました。

日本で私を助けてくれる人がいなく,懲戒解雇では再就職も覚束ないために,私は翌6/23にドイツに飛び立ち,ドイツへの亡命を申請をしました。

しかし,ドイツ政府は1年待たせたあげく,私の提示した資料を全て紛失した上で,"明らかに根拠なし"として強制送還されることになっています。

私は,7/3の17:25成田着のエミレーツ航空で,ドバイ経由で強制送還されることになっています。

帰国になりましたら,私の相談に乗っていただけませんでしょうか?

私の言い分の概要は下記に纏めています。

【最新版】日立製作所による個人情報保護法違反事件についてのご説明
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2013/06/post-c7a9.html

そのほかの言い分など,以下に書いています。

テーマ 日立製作所個人情報保護法違反
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/cat53787351/index.html

いま,誰も騒がないために,このまま帰国し文字通り抹殺されてしまうのではと非常に不安です。

未だにこのように,インターネット上に私に関する個人情報漏洩書き込みが継続されているにも関わらずの強制送還には,非常に理不尽なものを感じています。

日立製作所の者に拠ると思しき大西の個人情報漏洩書き込みその1
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2013/06/post-1334.html
日立製作所の者に拠ると思しき大西の個人情報漏洩書き込みその2
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2013/06/post-d14f.html
日立製作所の者に拠ると思しき大西の個人情報漏洩書き込みその3
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2013/06/post-cd8d.html
日立製作所の者に拠ると思しき大西の個人情報漏洩書き込みその4
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2013/06/post-0259.html
日立製作所の者に拠ると思しき大西の個人情報漏洩書き込みその5
http://onicchan.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2013/06/post-b489.html

日立を公益通報→懲戒解雇された大西秀宜スレ3
http://anago.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/tubo/1371656006/l50
日本人大西秀宜韓国へ亡命申請中
http://awabi.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/korea/1371555132/l50

なにとぞご検討のほど,宜しくお願いします。
ご連絡をお待ちしています。

大西秀宜

« 2013年6月27日 | トップページ | 2013年6月29日 »

2017年6月
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  

最近の記事

最近のコメント

カテゴリー

最近のトラックバック